Polybius, Histories (English) (XML Header) [genre: prose] [word count] [lemma count] [Polyb.]. | ||
<<Polyb. 3.28 | Polyb. 3.29 (Greek) | >>Polyb. 3.30 |
I have explained the pleas advanced by the Carthaginians; I must now state what is alleged on the contrary by
the Romans, For though it is true that in this particular interview, owing to their anger at the fall of
Next they alleged that the clause in the treaty respecting
treaty, from its benefits. But since neither of these provisions was made, it was plain that both the then existing allies, and all those taken subsequently on either side, were entitled to reciprocal security. And this was only reasonable. For it was not likely that they would have made a treaty depriving them of the power, when opportunity offered, of taking on such friends or allies as seemed to their interest; nor, again, if they had taken any such under their protection, was it to be supposed that they would allow them to be injured by any persons whatever. But, in fact, the main thing present in the minds of both parties to the treaty was, that they should mutually agree to abstain from attacking each other's allies, and on no account admit into alliance with themselves the allies of the other: and it was to subsequent allies that this particular clause applied, "Neither shall enlist soldiers, or impose contributions on the provinces or allies of the other; and all shall be alike secure of attack from the other side."
Polybius, Histories (English) (XML Header) [genre: prose] [word count] [lemma count] [Polyb.]. | ||
<<Polyb. 3.28 | Polyb. 3.29 (Greek) | >>Polyb. 3.30 |