Polybius, Histories (English) (XML Header) [genre: prose] [word count] [lemma count] [Polyb.]. | ||
<<Polyb. 6.46 | Polyb. 6.47 (Greek) | >>Polyb. 6.48 |
In what the difference between them consists I have already stated. I will now address myself to showing that the Cretan constitution deserves neither praise nor imitation.
To my mind, then, there are two things fundamental note to every state, in virtue of which its powers and constitution become desirable or objectionable. These are customs and laws. Of these the desirable are those which make men's private lives holy and pure, and the public character of the state
civilised and just. The objectionable are those whose effect
is the reverse. As, then, when we see good customs
and good laws prevailing among certain people, we confidently assume that, in consequence of them, the men and
their civil constitution will be good also, so when we see
private life full of covetousness, and public policy of injustice,
plainly we have reason for asserting their laws, particular customs, and general constitution
to be bad. Now, with few exceptions, you could find no habits prevailing in private life more
steeped in treachery than those in
Nor again would it be fair to introduce the Republic note
of Plato, which is also spoken of in high
terms by some philosophers. For just as we
refuse admission to the athletic contests
to those actors or athletes who have not acquired a
recognised position note or trained for them, so we ought not to
admit this Platonic constitution to the contest for the prize
of merit unless it can first point to some genuine and practical
achievement. Up to this time the notion of bringing it into
comparison with the constitutions of
Polybius, Histories (English) (XML Header) [genre: prose] [word count] [lemma count] [Polyb.]. | ||
<<Polyb. 6.46 | Polyb. 6.47 (Greek) | >>Polyb. 6.48 |